Posted on

spectrum number 1800

Research into online and offline reports from Spectrum Cable customers shows mixed feelings about the level of customer support that Spectrum offers. Many callers complain of long wait times as well as difficulty getting satisfactory responses to requests for customer service. Another complaint that is typical of the cable industry is confusion over rates: Some callers feel that they are charged inconsistent amounts for their service packages.

Here are a few things you can do to help ensure a successful customer service call:

How Do Consumers Feel About Their Calls to Spectrum Cable?

People call Spectrum Cable customer support for a range of reasons, including:

If you get off the phone with Spectrum Cable customer service and feel as though the all went badly because you were unable to resolve your issue or get your questions answered, don’t fret. You may still have options.

While 888-615-0301 is Spectrum’s best toll-free number, there are 2 total ways to get in touch with them. The next best way to talk to their customer support team , according to other Spectrum customers, is by calling their 833-780-1880 phone number for their Customer Service department. Besides calling, the next favorite option for customers looking for help is via 833-780-1880 for Customer Service. If you think this information is inaccurate or know of other ways to contact Spectrum please let us know so we can share with other customers. And you can click here if you want to compare all the contact information we’ve gathered for Spectrum.

This Spectrum phone number is ranked #2 out of 2 because 19,098 Spectrum customers tried our tools and information and gave us feedback after they called. The reason customers call 833-780-1880 is to reach the Spectrum Customer Service department for problems like Cancel or change services, Setup Account, Complaint, Lower My Bill, Service or technical issues. As far as we can tell, Spectrum has call center locations in Tampa, FL or Argentina and you can call during their open hours Mon-Fri 9am-5pm EST. Spectrum has 2 phone numbers and 2 different ways to get customer help. We’ve compiled information about 833-780-1880 and ways to call or contact Spectrum with help from customers like yourself. Please help us continue to grow and improve this information and these tools by sharing with people you know who might find it useful.

Calling Spectrum at this number should be pretty straightforward. Also important is what you do once you call, or what your other phone number options are. Unfortunately, our call-you-back tool is not available for 833-780-1880. For companies that we support, we call for you, press the right buttons to get through the phone menus, wait on hold, and call you back when Spectrum Customer Service agents can talk. It’s not available here, but keep an eye out for it when future customer service issues arise with companies other than Spectrum Once on the phone with Spectrum’s Customer Service department, you may need to provide them with information that identifies you as a customer, like your full name (or name on the account), email address, phone number, or an account number. It’s usually worthwhile to gather this information before you call.

Calling Spectrum

While 833-780-1880 is Spectrum’s #2 most popular phone number, it’s not the only way to get a hold of their customer care team. You already know from reading above that 888-615-0301 is their best customer phone number overall, and we have put together a comparison of their 2 total ways to contact support for you to look at as well. One thing to keep in mind as you try to reach Spectrum help by calling them, is that other customers give their customer support at this number a 64% score for their communication skills and a 85% score for the overall help they received. That could be indicative of their abilities to help you resolve your problem overall, regardless of whether or not you call this number.

Of course, given the collective ingenuity of the cartel’s engineers and scientists, it should have been possible to design a lightbulb that was both bright and long-lived. But such a product would have interfered with members’ desire to sell more bulbs. And sell more bulbs they did, at least initially. In fiscal year 1926–27, for instance, the cartel sold 335.7 million lightbulbs worldwide; four years later, sales had climbed to 420.8 million. What’s more, despite the fact that the actual costs of manufacturing were dropping, the cartel maintained more or less stable prices and therefore higher profit margins. From its inception until the end of 1930, the cartel retained its overwhelming share of a growing market. But the good times would not last.

For a detailed look at the incandescent lightbulb industry in the early 20th century, see Volume 3 of I.J. Blanken’s The History of Philips Electronics N.V. (European Library, 1999).

Whether or not these pricier bulbs will actually last that long is still an open question, and not one that the average consumer is likely to investigate. There are already reports of CFLs and LED lamps burning out long before their rated lifetimes were reached. Such incidents may well have resulted from nothing more sinister than careless manufacturing. But there is no denying that these far more technologically sophisticated products offer tempting opportunities for the inclusion of purposefully engineered life-shortening defects. After all, few people will complain, or even notice, if a bulb burns out 9 years after it is installed rather than 14. True, today’s lighting industry is much larger and more diverse than it was in the 1920s and ’30s, and government monitoring of collusive behavior is more vigilant. Nevertheless, the allure for businesses to cooperate in such a market is strong. And the Phoebus cartel shows how it could succeed.

International General Electric

Powerful and influential though it was, the Phoebus cartel was short-lived. Within six years of its formation, the cartel was already starting to struggle. Between 1930 and 1933, its sales volume dropped by more than 20 percent—even as the overall market for lighting was growing. The cartel was also weakened by the expiration of GE’s basic lightbulb patents in 1929, 1930, and 1933, by occasional conflicts among its members, and by legal attacks, particularly in the United States. What ultimately killed Phoebus, however, was World War II. As the members’ host countries went to war, close coordination became impossible. The cartel’s 1924 agreement, which was supposed to last until 1955, was nullified in 1940.

Companies were also fined for exceeding their sales quotas, which were constantly being adjusted. In 1927, for example, Tokyo Electric noted in a memo to the cartel that after shortening the lives of its vacuum and gas-filled lightbulbs, sales had jumped fivefold. “But if the increase in our business resulting from such endeavors directly mean[s] a heavy penalty, it must be a thing out of reason and shall quite discourage us,” the memo stated.

It wasn’t easy being a lightbulb maker in the early 20th century. The rapid spread of electrification and the introduction of new forms of lighting like bicycle lamps, car headlights, and streetlights did offer nearly limitless opportunities for inventors and entrepreneurs. But as thousands of manufacturers vied for market share and a technological edge, no single company felt assured of stable sales from one year to the next. That was as true for tiny backroom operations as it was for the giant corporate entities with multinational factories and research laboratories. Immediately preceding the cartel’s formation, for instance, Osram experienced a dizzying drop in its German sales, from 63 million lightbulbs in the financial year 1922–23 to 28 million the following year. Not surprisingly, Osram head William Meinhardt was the first to propose the arrangement that eventually became the Phoebus cartel.

GE is also the focus of Leonard S. Reich’s “General Electric and the World Cartelization of Electric Lamps,” in International Cartels in Business History: The International Conference on Business History 18 (University of Tokyo Press, 1992), edited by Akira Kudō and Terushi Hara.